Free demo for you to experience

Most customers worry about the quality about buying ISOIEC20000LI actual exam files because they have never bought before. In order to win your trust, we have developed the free demo of the ISOIEC20000LI exam training for you. If you still have doubts about our ISOIEC20000LI test quiz: Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam, please try our free demo. You can download our free demo of the ISOIEC20000LI actual exam material on our websites quickly. It does not take long to download the free demo. Of course, the free demo only includes part of the contents. We believe that you will truly trust us after trying our ISOIEC20000LI exam training. The contents will attract your concentration. You will find that learning can be so interesting. What are you waiting for? Come to try our free demo of the ISOIEC20000LI test quiz: Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam.

High passing rate

People always concern the passing rate when they choose to buy a test engine. A good test engine will help you pass the exam easily and quickly. If you still cannot decide, we strongly advise you to buy our ISOIEC20000LI actual exam material. The passing rate of our ISOIEC20000LI exam training is high. In fact, most customers will choose our products when they purchase a ISOIEC20000LI test quiz: Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam. We have built a good reputation in the market. In addition, all the knowledge is organized orderly. You will not feel confused when you practice on our ISOIEC20000LI actual exam material. According to our investigation, 99% people pass the exam for the first time. We believe that you can wipe out your doubts now. Why not giving our ISOIEC20000LI exam training a chance? We will never let you down.

Many people dreams to become rich quickly. However, it is no use if you always think without doing. You should have a clear plan at least. As old saying goes, practice makes perfect. If you have no clear idea, you can try our ISOIEC20000LI test quiz: Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam. You can prepare yourself well before you find your true aim. Our ISOIEC20000LI actual exam files can help you learn many useful skills. You can try to do something by yourself after learning our ISOIEC20000LI exam training. The whole learning experience is happy and interesting. Please choose our ISOIEC20000LI test quiz: Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam. We are looking forward to your coming.

DOWNLOAD DEMO

Three versions for your convenience

Nowadays, as the development of technology, traditional learning methods are not very popular among students. Our company also follows the trend of the epoch. So we have released three versions of the ISOIEC20000LI test quiz: Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam. They are windows software, PDF version and APP version of the ISOIEC20000LI actual exam files. You can choose what version you like best anyway. Different versions of the ISOIEC20000LI exam training will give you a different learning experience. Of course, we strongly recommend the combination of the three versions of the Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam training material, which can help you learn a lot. At present, our three versions of the ISOIEC20000LI test quiz: Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam are very popular now. It is a great experience to enjoy a different learning method.

ISO Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Sample Questions:

1. Scenario 4: TradeB. a commercial bank that has just entered the market, accepts deposits from its clients and offers basic financial services and loans for investments. TradeB has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 Having no experience of a management
[^system implementation, TradeB's top management contracted two experts to direct and manage the ISMS implementation project.
First, the project team analyzed the 93 controls of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and their objectives Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on three nonnumerical categories (low, medium, and high). They evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria and decided to treat only the high risk category They also decided to focus primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures by establishing a new version of the access control policy, implementing controls to manage and control user access, and implementing a control for ICT readiness for business continuity Lastly, they drafted a risk assessment report, in which they wrote that if after the implementation of these security controls the level of risk is below the acceptable level, the risks will be accepted Which of the actions presented in scenario 4 is NOT compliant with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001?

A) The external experts selected security controls and drafted the Statement of Applicability
B) The Statement of Applicability was drafted before conducting the risk assessment
C) TradeB selected only ISO/IEC 27001 controls deemed applicable to the company

2. The purpose of control 7.2 Physical entry of ISO/IEC 27001 is to ensure only authorized access to, the organization's information and other associated assets occur. Which action below does NOT fulfill this purpose?

A) Implementing access points
B) Using appropriate entry controls
C) Verifying items of equipment containing storage media

3. An organization has established a policy that provides the personnel with the information required to effectively deploy encryption solutions in order to protect organizational confidential data. What type of policy is this?

A) High-level general policy
B) High-level topic-specific policy
C) Topic-specific policy

4. Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS.
However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off- site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body According to scenario 10, NetworkFuse requested from the certification body to review all the documentation only on-site. Is this acceptable?

A) Yes, the auditee may request that the review of the documentation takes place on-site
B) Yes, only if a confidentiality agreement is formerly signed by the audit team
C) No, the certification body decides whether the documentation review takes place on-site or off-site

5. Scenario 4: TradeB. a commercial bank that has just entered the market, accepts deposits from its clients and offers basic financial services and loans for investments. TradeB has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 Having no experience of a management
[^system implementation, TradeB's top management contracted two experts to direct and manage the ISMS implementation project.
First, the project team analyzed the 93 controls of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and their objectives Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on three nonnumerical categories (low, medium, and high). They evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria and decided to treat only the high risk category They also decided to focus primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures by establishing a new version of the access control policy, implementing controls to manage and control user access, and implementing a control for ICT readiness for business continuity Lastly, they drafted a risk assessment report, in which they wrote that if after the implementation of these security controls the level of risk is below the acceptable level, the risks will be accepted What should TradeB do in order to deal with residual risks? Refer to scenario 4.

A) TradeB should evaluate, calculate, and document the value of risk reduction following risk treatment
B) TradeB should accept the residual risks only above the acceptance level
C) TradeB should immediately implement new controls to treat all residual risks

Solutions: